Make hiring decisions on
evidence, not instinct.
We read your finance shortlist, score it against the role, and hand back one written recommendation with the evidence behind it.
Four steps from opinion to evidence.
Four steps from gut feel to a shared standard, so two reviewers reading the same candidate start from the same facts.
Read
Your shortlist, read closely against the role.
Score
Scored against a rubric built for the role.
Compare
Candidates set side by side on the same criteria.
Calibrate
One defensible recommendation, with the reasons and the risks named.
- Analytical rigor
- Written clarity
- Stakeholder judgment
- Ownership
The work you keep.
The written verdict, the scorecard, and every working file behind the decision.
- IRole-specific scorecard
- IICandidate-reading guide
- IIIInterview question bank
- IVStructured role definition
- VHiring-risk notes
- VIExecutive findings memo
For whoever owns the finance hire.
Founders
Your first finance hire, decided on evidence.
CFOs and finance leaders
An independent read on your next number-owner.
Boards and investors
A key appointment resting on more than a hunch.
Lean finance teams
A senior second opinion, without adding headcount.
One role. One shortlist. One verdict.
Send the role and your shortlist. We read, score, and hand back the memo. One role · 2 weeks · fixed fee.
Before you ask.
Is this recruitment?
No. You source the shortlist. We evaluate it and hand back a written verdict. No sourcing, no placement fee.
Why finance roles only?
Because the evaluation rests on finance judgment. Reading whether a controller actually owned a close is the same work Daftar does on a set of financial statements. Outside finance we would be guessing.
Does it replace our interviewers?
No. Your panel still interviews. The Verdict gives them a scorecard and a written read on the evidence, so the decision rests on something they can point to.
Bring one finance role to Calibre.
Tell us the role and where your shortlist stands. We reply within two days.